Wednesday, April 30, 2014

The Twitter In The Coalmine: The End of Asset Price Inflation?

Poor dead Twitter-bird . . .
So Twitter (TWTR) released some user figures, and they are not good. Bottom line, they’re losing money, and their user-base is shrinking—which is why their stock took an 11% tumble in after-hours trading as I write these words. From a high of 71.31 back in December 2013, to 42.62 at the close on Tuesday (April 29)—and then down to 37.83 in after-hours trading once the news came out.

In other words, Twitter’s stock has fallen nearly 50% in four months. Eeesh!

For those of you keeping score, this is the second internet bubble, or “Bubble 2.0”. And unlike the first internet bubble (which at least had the decency to be based on actual profits and revenues), the “social media revolution”—Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, etc.—eschewed profits (or even revenues!) for the sake of building traffic and user bases. Users and traffic has been the metric to measure the value of a social media company.

I know—crazy. Yet somehow, by some weird mind-control power, all the social media companies—Twitter among them—convinced Wall Street and Main Street investors that their actual revenues and profits didn’t matter: All that mattered were the numbers of people who used their services. Twitter made no money? So what! It had 200 million users, and growing.

So from the point of view of investors, they would never see a profit via a dividend or some other yield—they would only see a profit if the stock price rose.

In other words, people weren’t investing in social media companies—they were speculating, hanging their valuations on user numbers and traffic.

Twitter, of course, failed to deliver on the metrics. So Twitter’s stock has taken a beating. And will probably continue to take further beatings, as its numbers flatline.

But Twitter and its situation aren’t important—what’s important is, the fall in Twitter’s stock price points to the single big problem we have been having since 2008: Investors don’t care about yields, only asset prices.

In other words, and to repeat: No one is investing—they are all speculating. Nobody is buying an asset—be it equities, bonds, real estate—and sitting back contentedly receiving an 8% or 9% yield. No, everyone is buying with an eye to a sale—hopefully soon—without even bothering to cash the laughably tiny dividend check.

The reason is simple: Since the Federal Reserve has implemented the zero interest-rate policy (ZIRP) and kept Treasury yields absurdly low by way of Quantitative Easing, nothing—no investment class at all—is delivering yields much above 6%. By flattening the yield curve on the Treasury bonds, the Fed has also flattened the yield curve of every other asset class.

So investors depend on the rise in the asset’s price—and not the dividend, rent, coupon or yield it can produce—for their profit.

The Fed has created asset-price inflation—it was their avowed intention! They wanted to shore up Treasury bond prices and keep their yields low.

But from the point of view of investors, constantly rising asset prices is actually a speculative mania: Investors are chasing rising asset prices, and instantly dumping them the second they fail to deliver on whatever arbitrary metric their valuation depends on.

Twitter’s price is tanking not because investors suddenly realized it didn’t produce a profit—after all, it never did: Twitter’s price tanked because investors realized that the jig was up. I am writing on Tuesday evening, but I have no doubt that by the time you read this on Wednesday after the markets open, Twitter’s share price will have fallen even further.

Because of the Fed’s policies, investing has essentially become a game of musical chairs: Nobody knows when the music will stop, so the winners turn out to be the nimble, not the wise. Your market acument matters little—what matters is your ability to get in and most especially get out as quickly as possible from the markets.

And this is happening across all asset classes. Because you see, all asset classes are overpriced, all of them a single announcement away from a bad, bad tumble.

Now what happens when all asset prices collapse at the same time? Or maybe not all, but just a bunch, all at once?

We’re tracking this at LiraSPG, and planning for when this inflated equities market will end. The whole point of our shop is to game-play and strategize contingent events—but this crash in asset prices isn’t a “maybe”: It’s an inevitability. Asset price inflation will end.

Why will it end? Because all bubbles end: Nothing can rise perpetually in price, all the way to infinity.

Now, when will it end? When everyone realizes that they have all been playing a game of musical chairs. The winners will be the ones who sell first—and everyone will realize this. So once the first few sell, everyone will be rushing for the exits—and that’s when the crash will happen.

Twitter is the blue-canary in the coalmine. It is a warning investors—especially equities investors—should heed.
If you are interested, do check out the preview page of The Strategic Planning Group, and see what it’s about.


  1. So very true. I like the comment; "Twitter is the blue-canary in the coalmine."

    So what are the investment banks, funds etc waiting on to sell? More liquidity from the average investor....Think of it like this, if you kept your money in the markets and the DOW increased a dramatic 10%, (DOW plus 1,580 to 17,138) over the next year and you captured 8% from your "diversified" investments verses....compared to getting out of the market NOW, locking in your profits and protecting yourself from BIG money getting out soon. Otherwise, you are riding the wave down AGAIN....lock in now, do not worry about gaining a little now as you may be losing much when the market will drop, and it will....

  2. Well... The first internet bubble was certainly much, much more severe and based on anything but actual business / profit models, so I would have to disagree in the extreme to your assertion about Internet Bubble 2.0 being worse. There were 100s of companies in 1999/2000 that went public without any possibility of making money; the effectively: we'll make it up in volume. I remember when "traditional" companies announced they were going to have a website... even the guys who make the leather belts for pro wrestlers had a moonshot on their stock on such announcements. Yes, this situation is bad, but not like before. Remember Akamai? public offering in the $20s, first trade over $100, $300 a couple of months later and below a buck at the worst of it. Even if Priceline drops to $200, it is a moneymaking company.

  3. Where's the hyperinflation.

    Asset price crashes with hyperinflation? Really.

    1. Definitely: Asset prices plummet during hyperinflation, in real terms and even occasionally in nominal terms (under very particular circumstances).

      I write about it in my book Hyperinflation in America.

      Read it and see if it makes sense to you.



Whether you agree with me or not, thank you for your comment.

If you liked what I wrote—or if it at least made you think—don’t be shy about making a payment. The PayPal button is there for your convenience.

If you have a question or a private comment, do feel free to e-mail me at my address